Sanchez v. Rojas, S294671.
#26-33 Sanchez v. Rojas, S294671. (B338298; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV41948.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Should this court overrule or limit its holding in Elden v.
Dreher v. Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power, S294899.
#26-32 Dreher v. Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power, S294899. (B329610; 116 Cal.App.5th 977; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 19STCV07272.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Do
California Fair Plan Assn. v. Lara, S294806.
#26-31 California Fair Plan Assn. v. Lara, S294806. (B336043; 116 Cal.App.5th 869; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV38060.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded with directions. This case presents the following issue: Under Insurance Code
Lorenzo v. San Francisco Zen Center, S294565.
#26-19 Lorenzo v. San Francisco Zen Center, S294565. (A171659; 116 Cal.App.5th 258; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC22602047.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Does the ministerial exception
Li v. Arcsoft, Inc., S294190.
#26-18 Li v. Arcsoft, Inc., S294190. (9th Cir. Nos. 24-2531, 24-2964; 160 F.4th 1063; Northern District of California; D.C. No. 4:19-cv-05836-JSW.) Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the
Raju v. Superior Court, S281001.
#23-175 Raju v. Superior Court, S281001. (A164736; 92 Cal.App.5th 438, mod. 92 Cal.App.5th 1222; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSRA210005.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) Does a taxpayer
Resendiz v. Canyon Restaurant, Ltd., S293166.
#25-328 Resendiz v. Canyon Restaurant, Ltd., S293166. (B342091; nonpublished opinion; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 24CV00190.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing in Neubecker and Resendiz
Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc., S280256.
#23-160 Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc., S280256. (B314490; 90 Cal.App.5th 919; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 20STCV35350.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a petition to compel arbitration in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Is
Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164.
#24-259 Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164. (C100036; 104 Cal.App.5th 468; Sacramento County Superior Court; 21FE018661.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following issues: (1) Does the presence of 0.36 grams of loose
Taylor v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S294365.
#26-17 Taylor v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S294365. (D083730; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2023-00024862-CU-BC-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action and remanded with directions. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Lathrop
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.