California Supreme Court Watch
#19-89 Zakaryan v. The Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., S255610.
#19-89 Zakaryan v. The Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., S255610. (B289192; 33 Cal.App.5th 659; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC647541.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a petition to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending
#19-88 Strouse v. Webcor Construction, L.P., S256136.
#19-88 Strouse v. Webcor Construction, L.P., S256136. (A148863; 34 Cal.App.5th 703; Alameda County Superior Court; RG13670376.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc., S252796 (#19-09),
#19-79 Burch v. CertainTeed Corp., S255969.
#19-79 Burch v. CertainTeed Corp., S255969. (A151633, A152252, A153624; 34 Cal.App.5th 341; Alameda County Superior Court; RG16819332.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#19-68 Orchard Estate Homes, Inc. v. Orchard Homeowner Alliance, S255031.
#19-68 Orchard Estate Homes, Inc. v. Orchard Homeowner Alliance, S255031. (E068064; 32 Cal.App.5th 471; Riverside County Superior Court; PSC1700644.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents issues relating to the requirements of Civil Code
#19-57 Sass v. Cohen, S255262. (B283122; 32 Cal.App.5th 1032, mod. 33 Cal.App.5th 942a; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC554035.)
#19-57 Sass v. Cohen, S255262. (B283122; 32 Cal.App.5th 1032, mod. 33 Cal.App.5th 942a; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC554035.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issues: (1) In a
#19-56 Sealutions, LLC v. Schwab, S254818. (B286897; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC546925.)
#19-56 Sealutions, LLC v. Schwab, S254818. (B286897; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC546925.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal issued an order precluding former counsel for the appellant from filing a brief on appeal. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#19-46 Conservatorship of O.B., S254938. (B290805; 32 Cal.App.5th 626; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 17PR00325.)
#19-46 Conservatorship of O.B., S254938. (B290805; 32 Cal.App.5th 626; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 17PR00325.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a conservatorship proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: On appellate review in a conservatorship proceeding
#18-151 Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, S251392. (E066267; 26 Cal.App.5th 54; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1511553.)
#18-151 Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, S251392. (E066267; 26 Cal.App.5th 54; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1511553.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order granting in part and denying in part a special motion to strike.
#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.)
#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Wilson
#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.)
#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying class certification in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.,
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2020 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.