Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC, S291199.
#25-241 Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC, S291199. (B335445; 110 Cal.App.5th 932; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV05372.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Leeper v. Shipt, Inc.,
11640 Woodbridge Condominium Homeowners’ Assn. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, S290750.
#25-222 11640 Woodbridge Condominium Homeowners’ Assn. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, S290750. (B333848; 110 Cal.App.5th 211; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22STCV00778.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does a provision
Brown v. City of Inglewood, S280773.
#23-187 Brown v. City of Inglewood, S280773. (B320658; 92 Cal.App.5th 1256; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV30604.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order in a civil action. The court limited review to the following
Ford Motor Warranty Cases, S279969.
#23-148 Ford Motor Warranty Cases, S279969. (B312261; 89 Cal.App.5th 1324; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC596216.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The court limited review to the following issue: Do manufacturers’ express or
In re Bradshaw on Discipline, S282314.
#24-80 In re Bradshaw on Discipline, S282314. (Unpublished opinion; State Bar Ct. No. 16-O-15558.) Petition for review after a State Bar Court recommendation of discipline of an attorney. This case presents the following issue: What is the appropriate discipline in light of the record in
K.C. v. County of Merced, S290435.
#25-208 K.C. v. County of Merced, S290435. (F087088; 109 Cal.App.5th 606; Merced County Superior Court; 22CV-02896.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Was plaintiff’s complaint alleging that a social worker
TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233.
#24-180 TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233. (F083724; 102 Cal.App.5th 1040; Kern County Superior Court; S1500-CV-282520_JEB.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed orders in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court limited review to
Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Company, S290724.
#25-179 Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Company, S290724. (A172271; 109 Cal.App.5th 1196; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVSB2208834.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Ford Motor Warranty
Yazdi v. San Diego County Credit Union, S290233.
#25-177 Yazdi v. San Diego County Credit Union, S290233. (D083835; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2021-00053145-CU-WT-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court,
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952.
#25-148 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952. (B335686; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV14351.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a claimant
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.