California Supreme Court Watch

May 08, 2019
#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.)

#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Wilson

May 08, 2019
#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.)

#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying class certification in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.,

Apr 22, 2019
#19-40 Rall v. Tribune 365 LLC, S254282. (B284566; 31 Cal.App.5th 479; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC613703.)

#19-40 Rall v. Tribune 365 LLC, S254282. (B284566; 31 Cal.App.5th 479; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC613703.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order granting a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision

Apr 22, 2019
#19-33 Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., S253593. (9th Cir. No. 17-16452; 913 F.3d 923; Northern District of California No. 5:17-cv-00447-NC)

#19-33 Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., S253593. (9th Cir. No. 17-16452; 913 F.3d 923; Northern District of California No. 5:17-cv-00447-NC) Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending

Apr 22, 2019
#19-32 Stancil v. Superior Court, S253783. (A156100; nonpublished order; San Mateo County Superior Court; 18AD000039.)

#19-32 Stancil v. Superior Court, S253783. (A156100; nonpublished order; San Mateo County Superior Court; 18AD000039.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. The court issued an order to show cause and limited review to the following issue:

Apr 22, 2019
#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.)

#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Can employers utilize practices upheld in the

Apr 22, 2019
#19-27 Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc., S253574. (9th Cir. No. 17- 15221; 913 F.3d 911; Northern District of California No. No. 3:15-cv-05143-WHO.)

#19-27 Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc., S253574. (9th Cir. No. 17- 15221; 913 F.3d 911; Northern District of California No. No. 3:15-cv-05143-WHO.) Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter

Mar 02, 2019
#19-23 Kaanaana v. Barrett Business Services, Inc., S253458. (B276420, B279838; 29 Cal.App.5th 778; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC496090, BC594050.)

#19-23 Kaanaana v. Barrett Business Services, Inc., S253458. (B276420, B279838; 29 Cal.App.5th 778; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC496090, BC594050.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed a judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Should the

Mar 02, 2019
#19-22 Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc., S253295. (A152692; 29 Cal.App.5th 203; Alameda County Superior Court; RG16838191.)

#19-22 Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc., S253295. (A152692; 29 Cal.App.5th 203; Alameda County Superior Court; RG16838191.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) Was a witness’s testimony about his recollection of

Feb 18, 2019
#19-21 Wilmot v. Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S252988. (A152100; 29 Cal.App.5th 846; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSN161730.)

#19-21 Wilmot v. Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S252988. (A152100; 29 Cal.App.5th 846; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSN161730.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More