California Supreme Court Watch

Sep 14, 2020
#20-250 Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles, S263734.

#20-250 Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles, S263734. (B295181, B295315; 51 Cal.App.5th 621; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS170127, BS170352.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgments in actions for writ of

Aug 17, 2020
#20-227 Conservatorship of J.Y., S263044.

#20-227 Conservatorship of J.Y., S263044. (A157323; 49 Cal.App.5th 220; Contra Costa County Superior Court; P0400120.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed as moot an appeal in a conservatorship proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Conservatorship of E.B., S261812 (#20-155),

Aug 17, 2020
#20-225 Betancourt v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC, S262866.

#20-225 Betancourt v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC, S262866. (B293625; 49 Cal.App.5th 240; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC629916.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the award of attorney fees in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Naranjo

Aug 10, 2020
#20-214 D’Arcy v. Schulte, S262532.

#20-214 D’Arcy v. Schulte, S262532. (G057203; nonpublished opinion; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00916754.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Geiser v. Kuhns,

Aug 10, 2020
#20-209 Zolly v. City of Oakland, S262634.

#20-209 Zolly v. City of Oakland, S262634. (A154986; 47 Cal.App.5th 73; Alameda County Superior Court; RG16821376.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must city

Aug 10, 2020
#20-206 Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, S262699.

#20-206 Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, S262699. (B294872; 47 Cal.App.5th 532; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC676917.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) In a cause of action alleging

Aug 10, 2020
#20-205 Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates, S262663.

#20-205 Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates, S262663. (C080349; 47 Cal.App.5th 415; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201480001842CUWMGDS.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the

Jul 29, 2020
#20-198 Lopez v. Ledesma, S262487. (B284452; 46 Cal.App.5th 980; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC519180.)

#20-198 Lopez v. Ledesma, S262487. (B284452; 46 Cal.App.5th 980; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC519180.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Was a physician’s assistant who treated a patient without

Jul 22, 2020
#20-196 Weimer v. Nationstar Mortgage, LCC, S262024. (C080550; 47 Cal.App.5th 341; Placer County Superior Court; SCV0035286.)

#20-196 Weimer v. Nationstar Mortgage, LCC, S262024. (C080550; 47 Cal.App.5th 341; Placer County Superior Court; SCV0035286.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in

Jul 22, 2020
#20-188 Geiser v. Kuhns, S262032. (B279738; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS161018, BS161019, BS161020.)

#20-188 Geiser v. Kuhns, S262032. (B279738; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS161018, BS161019, BS161020.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order awarding attorney fees in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: How should it

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More