California Supreme Court Watch

Mar 22, 2021
#20-01 Brown v. USA Taekwondo, S259216. (B280550; 40 Cal.App.5th 1077, mod. 41 Cal.App.5th 567a, mod. 41 Cal.App.5th 567d; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC599321.)

#20-01 Brown v. USA Taekwondo, S259216. (B280550; 40 Cal.App.5th 1077, mod. 41 Cal.App.5th 567a, mod. 41 Cal.App.5th 567d; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC599321.)  Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue:

Mar 22, 2021
#19-104 Shalabi v. City of Fontana, S256665. (E069671; 35 Cal.App.5th 639; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVDS1314694.)

#19-104 Shalabi v. City of Fontana, S256665. (E069671; 35 Cal.App.5th 639; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVDS1314694.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Code of Civil Procedure section

Mar 22, 2021
#18-166 Villanueva v. Fidelity National Title Co., S252035. (H041870; 26 Cal.App.5th 1092; Santa Clara County Superior Court; CV173356.)

#18-166 Villanueva v. Fidelity National Title Co., S252035. (H041870; 26 Cal.App.5th 1092; Santa Clara County Superior Court; CV173356.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issues: (1) Insurance Code section

Mar 22, 2021
#20-379 Conyer v. Hula Media Services, LLC, S264821.

#20-379 Conyer v. Hula Media Services, LLC, S264821. (B296738; 53 Cal.App.5th 1189; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC718750.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action and remanded with directions. This case

Mar 15, 2021
#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.)

#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Can employers utilize practices upheld in the

Mar 15, 2021
#21-130 Prang v. Amen, S266590.

#21-130 Prang v. Amen, S266590. (B298794; 58 Cal.App.5th 246; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS173698.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the term “stock” in Revenue and Taxation Code

Mar 15, 2021
#21-128 Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist., S266344.

#21-128 Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist., S266344. (F079811; 57 Cal.App.5th 911; Fresno County Superior Court; 12CECG03718.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is a lease-leaseback arrangement in

Mar 15, 2021
#20-18 Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc., S259027.

#20-18 Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc., S259027. (B282377; 40 Cal.App.5th 1131; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC536584.)  Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying class certification in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Vazquez

Mar 15, 2021
#19-92 In re Caden C., S255839.

#19-92 In re Caden C., S255839. (A153925, A154042; 34 Cal.App.5th 87; San Francisco County Superior Court; JD153034.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issues: (1) What standard of review

Mar 15, 2021
#19-188 Conservatorship of K.P., S258212. (B291510; 39 Cal.App.5th 254; Los Angeles County Superior Court; ZE032603.)

#19-188 Conservatorship of K.P., S258212. (B291510; 39 Cal.App.5th 254; Los Angeles County Superior Court; ZE032603.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Must the trier of fact find, beyond

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More