J.M. v. Illuminate Education, Inc., S286699.
#24-211 J.M. v. Illuminate Education, Inc., S286699. (B327683; 103 Cal.App.5th 1125; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00567324-CU-MC-VTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case presents the following issue: Is a company
Zenith Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S295357.
#26-76 Zenith Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S295357. (H052785; 118 Cal.App.5th 510; Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board; ADJ13725280.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the decision in a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Mayor
In re Z.G., S289430.
#25-131 In re Z.G., S289430. (E083710; nonpublished opinion; San Bernardino County Superior Court; J286808.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: Can parental rights properly be terminated pursuant to
Shear Development Co., LLC v. California Coastal Commission, S284378.
#24-99 Shear Development Co., LLC v. California Coastal Commission, S284378. (B319895; nonpublished opinion; San Luis Obispo County Superior Court; 20CV-0431.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case presents the following issue:
In re A.D., S293101.
#25-322 In re A.D., S293101. (B336356; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23CCJP04283, 23CCJP04283A.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re S.R., S285759 (#24-165), which presents
In re B.M., S291525.
#25-279 In re B.M., S291525. (B339378; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 24CCJP01914A.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed appeal as moot in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re S.R., S285759 (#24-165), which
Doe v. Coronado Unified School District, S295043.
#26-60 Doe v. Coronado Unified School District, S295043. (D084342; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2021-00006011-CU-PO-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case presents
Attorney General of the State of California v. Bianco, S295901.
#26-59 Attorney General of the State of California v. Bianco, S295901. (E088096; nonpublished order; Riverside County Superior Court; RI031920261.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief
Williams v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., S295344.
#26-58 Williams v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., S295344. (B342796; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 24SMCV01432.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in
Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Administrative Services, LLC, S295323.
#26-55 Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Administrative Services, LLC, S295323. (B338584; 117 Cal.App.5th 1048; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV08678.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order granting a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.