California Supreme Court Watch
#17-232 Boling v. Public Employment Relations Bd., S242034. (D069626, D069630; 10 Cal.App.5th 853; San Diego County Superior Court; 2464-M, LA-CE-746-M, LACE-752-M, LA-CE-755-M, LA-CE-758-M.)
#17-232 Boling v. Public Employment Relations Bd., S242034. (D069626, D069630; 10 Cal.App.5th 853; San Diego County Superior Court; 2464-M, LA-CE-746-M, LACE-752-M, LA-CE-755-M, LA-CE-758-M.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal annulled a decision of the Public Employment Relations Board. This case includes the following
#15-92 In re R.T., S226416. (B256411; 235 Cal.App.4th 795; Los Angeles County Superior Court; DK03719.)
#15-92 In re R.T., S226416. (B256411; 235 Cal.App.4th 795; Los Angeles County Superior Court; DK03719.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: Does Welfare and Institutions Code section 300,
#17-226 In re A.N., S242494. (B275914; 11 Cal.App.5th 403; Ventura County Superior Court; 2015040294.)
#17-226 In re A.N., S242494. (B275914; 11 Cal.App.5th 403; Ventura County Superior Court; 2015040294.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile truancy wardship proceeding. This case presents the following issues: (1) Is the utilization of a school attendance
#17-223 In re Priscilla A., S241995. (B276745; 11 Cal.App.5th 551; Los Angeles County Superior Court; DK15337.)
#17-223 In re Priscilla A., S241995. (B276745; 11 Cal.App.5th 551; Los Angeles County Superior Court; DK15337.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re R.T., S226416 (#15-92), which
#17-209 Voris v. Lampert, S241812. (B265747; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC408562.)
#17-209 Voris v. Lampert, S241812. (B265747; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC408562.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Is conversion of earned
#17-207 Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, S241655. (G048039; 9 Cal.App.5th 1204; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2008-00096591.)
#17-207 Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, S241655. (G048039; 9 Cal.App.5th 1204; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2008-00096591.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issues: (1) Did Senate Bill 327 constitute
#17-202 Jarman v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., S241431. (G051086; 9 Cal.App.5th 807; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC10007764.)
#17-202 Jarman v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., S241431. (G051086; 9 Cal.App.5th 807; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC10007764.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)
#17-200 Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Co., S241825. (C070770; 10 Cal.App.5th 590; Colusa County Superior Court; CV23759.)
#17-200 Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Co., S241825. (C070770; 10 Cal.App.5th 590; Colusa County Superior Court; CV23759.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Are the double damages provisions of Civil Code
#17-181 McClain v. Sav-On-Drugs, S241471. (B265011; p Cal.App.5th 684, mod. 10 Cal.App.5th 749d; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC325272, BC327216.)
#17-181 McClain v. Sav-On-Drugs, S241471. (B265011; p Cal.App.5th 684, mod. 10 Cal.App.5th 749d; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC325272, BC327216.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Can a purchaser of
#17-180 K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist., S241057. (B269864; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC505356.)
#17-180 K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist., S241057. (B269864; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC505356.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from an order in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the Court
Browse By Topic
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2017 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.