California Supreme Court Watch
Share
#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309.
#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309. (B299605; 50 Cal.App.5th 192; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC675950.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc., S252796 (#19-09),
#20-250 Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles, S263734.
#20-250 Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles, S263734. (B295181, B295315; 51 Cal.App.5th 621; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS170127, BS170352.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgments in actions for writ of
#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180.
#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180. (B290675; 49 Cal.App.5th 682; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS170473.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issue: Does the common law right
#20-227 Conservatorship of J.Y., S263044.
#20-227 Conservatorship of J.Y., S263044. (A157323; 49 Cal.App.5th 220; Contra Costa County Superior Court; P0400120.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed as moot an appeal in a conservatorship proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Conservatorship of E.B., S261812 (#20-155),
#20-225 Betancourt v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC, S262866.
#20-225 Betancourt v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC, S262866. (B293625; 49 Cal.App.5th 240; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC629916.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the award of attorney fees in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Naranjo
#20-214 D’Arcy v. Schulte, S262532.
#20-214 D’Arcy v. Schulte, S262532. (G057203; nonpublished opinion; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00916754.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Geiser v. Kuhns,
#20-209 Zolly v. City of Oakland, S262634.
#20-209 Zolly v. City of Oakland, S262634. (A154986; 47 Cal.App.5th 73; Alameda County Superior Court; RG16821376.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must city
#20-206 Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, S262699.
#20-206 Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, S262699. (B294872; 47 Cal.App.5th 532; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC676917.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) In a cause of action alleging
#20-205 Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates, S262663.
#20-205 Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates, S262663. (C080349; 47 Cal.App.5th 415; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201480001842CUWMGDS.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the
#20-198 Lopez v. Ledesma, S262487. (B284452; 46 Cal.App.5th 980; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC519180.)
#20-198 Lopez v. Ledesma, S262487. (B284452; 46 Cal.App.5th 980; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC519180.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Was a physician’s assistant who treated a patient without
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2020 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.