California Supreme Court Watch
Share
#19-139 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water Agency, S257009. (C082079; 36 Cal.App.5th 279, mod. 37 Cal.App.5th 164a; Amador County Superior Court; 16CV9564.)
#19-139 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water Agency, S257009. (C082079; 36 Cal.App.5th 279, mod. 37 Cal.App.5th 164a; Amador County Superior Court; 16CV9564.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#18-154 Coston v. Stanislaus County, S251721.
#18-154 Coston v. Stanislaus County, S251721. (F074209; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 201656.) Case transferred for reconsideration in light of Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479. Transferred to CA 5: 12/09/2020
#18-153 California Water Impact Network v. County of San Luis Obispo, S251056.
#18-153 California Water Impact Network v. County of San Luis Obispo, S251056. (B283846; 25 Cal.App.5th 666; San Luis Obispo County Superior Court; 16CVP- 0195.) Case transferred for reconsideration in light of Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479.
#20-310 Pico Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Santa Monica, S263972.
#20-310 Pico Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Santa Monica, S263972. (B295935; 51 Cal.App.5th 1002; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC616804.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court directed the parties to brief the following issue:
#20-140 Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court, S260846.
#20-140 Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court, S260846. (A157143; 46 Cal.App.5th 109; San Francisco County Superior Court; 13035657, 13035658) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Facebook, Inc. v.
#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180.
#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180. (B290675; 49 Cal.App.5th 682; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS170473.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issue: Does the common law right
#20-307 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Bay Area Toll Authority, S263835.
#20-307 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Bay Area Toll Authority, S263835. (A157598, A157972; 51 Cal.App.5th 435; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC18567860, CPF18516276.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#20-275 Segal v. ASICS America, S263569.
#20-275 Segal v. ASICS America, S263569. (B299184; 50 Cal.App.5th 659; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC597769.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a post-judgment order in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: May a party recover costs
#20-271 Domondo v. Three Olives Inc., S263701.
#20-271 Domondo v. Three Olives Inc., S263701. (B292561; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles; BC641464.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., S258019 (#19-173), which
#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309.
#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309. (B299605; 50 Cal.App.5th 192; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC675950.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc., S252796 (#19-09),
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2021 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.