California Supreme Court Watch
#18-49 Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. v. Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S247095. (A141913; 19 Cal.App.5th 61, mod. 19 Cal.App.5th 945a; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSN121870.)
#18-49 Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. v. Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S247095. (A141913; 19 Cal.App.5th 61, mod. 19 Cal.App.5th 945a; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSN121870.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in
#18-50 Kim v. Reins Internat. California, Inc., S246911. (B278642; 18 Cal.App.5th 1052; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC539194.)
#18-50 Kim v. Reins Internat. California, Inc., S246911. (B278642; 18 Cal.App.5th 1052; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC539194.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does an employee bringing an action
#18-51 Stewart v. San Luis Ambulance, Inc., S246255. (9th Cir. No. 15-56943; 878 F.3d 883; Central District of California; No. 2:13-cv-09458-BRO-SS.)
#18-51 Stewart v. San Luis Ambulance, Inc., S246255. (9th Cir. No. 15-56943; 878 F.3d 883; Central District of California; No. 2:13-cv-09458-BRO-SS.) Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide questions of California law presented in a matter pending in the United
#18-48 Lawson v. Z.B., N.A., S246711. (D071279, D071376; 18 Cal.App.5th 705; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2016-00005578-CU-OE-CTL.)
#18-48 Lawson v. Z.B., N.A., S246711. (D071279, D071376; 18 Cal.App.5th 705; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2016-00005578-CU-OE-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. This case presents the following issue: Does a representative action under the
#18-42 Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co., S246541. (9th Cir. No. 16-16037; 880 F.3d 493; Northern District of California; No. 15-cv-03797-EMC.)
#18-42 Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co., S246541. (9th Cir. No. 16-16037; 880 F.3d 493; Northern District of California; No. 15-cv-03797-EMC.) Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide questions of California law presented in a matter pending in the
#18-40 Southern California Gas Leak Cases, S246669. (B283606; 18 Cal.App.5th 581; Los Angeles County Superior Court; JCCP4861.)
#18-40 Southern California Gas Leak Cases, S246669. (B283606; 18 Cal.App.5th 581; Los Angeles County Superior Court; JCCP4861.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. This case presents the following issue: Can a plaintiff who is harmed
#18-39 Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., S246490. (A143026; 17 Cal.App.5th 1315; Marin County Superior Court; CIV1304712.)
#18-39 Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., S246490. (A143026; 17 Cal.App.5th 1315; Marin County Superior Court; CIV1304712.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying class certification in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a plaintiff seeking class
#18-37 Traveler’s Property Casualty Co. of America v. Actavis, Inc., S245867. (G053749; 16 Cal.App.5th 1026; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2014-00746842.)
#18-37 Traveler’s Property Casualty Co. of America v. Actavis, Inc., S245867. (G053749; 16 Cal.App.5th 1026; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2014-00746842.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Liberty Surplus
#18-35 Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, S246444. (G052551; 18 Cal.App.5th 453; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2014-00744604.)
#18-35 Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, S246444. (G052551; 18 Cal.App.5th 453; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2014-00744604.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order for restitution in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: When a consumer chooses restitution as
#18-24 San Diegans for Open Government v. Public Facilities Financing Authority of City of San Diego, S245996. (D069751; 16 Cal.App.5th 1273; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2015-00016536-CU-MC-CTL.)
#18-24 San Diegans for Open Government v. Public Facilities Financing Authority of City of San Diego, S245996. (D069751; 16 Cal.App.5th 1273; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2015-00016536-CU-MC-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2018 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.