California Supreme Court Watch
#19-57 Sass v. Cohen, S255262. (B283122; 32 Cal.App.5th 1032, mod. 33 Cal.App.5th 942a; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC554035.)
#19-57 Sass v. Cohen, S255262. (B283122; 32 Cal.App.5th 1032, mod. 33 Cal.App.5th 942a; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC554035.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issues: (1) In a
#19-56 Sealutions, LLC v. Schwab, S254818. (B286897; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC546925.)
#19-56 Sealutions, LLC v. Schwab, S254818. (B286897; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC546925.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal issued an order precluding former counsel for the appellant from filing a brief on appeal. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#19-46 Conservatorship of O.B., S254938. (B290805; 32 Cal.App.5th 626; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 17PR00325.)
#19-46 Conservatorship of O.B., S254938. (B290805; 32 Cal.App.5th 626; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 17PR00325.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a conservatorship proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: On appellate review in a conservatorship proceeding
#18-151 Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, S251392. (E066267; 26 Cal.App.5th 54; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1511553.)
#18-151 Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, S251392. (E066267; 26 Cal.App.5th 54; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1511553.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order granting in part and denying in part a special motion to strike.
#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.)
#19-45 Symmonds v. Mahoney, S254646. (B283529; 31 Cal.App.5th 1096; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC620563.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Wilson
#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.)
#19-43 Dhillon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, S254226. (F074952; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 14CECG03039.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying class certification in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.,
#19-40 Rall v. Tribune 365 LLC, S254282. (B284566; 31 Cal.App.5th 479; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC613703.)
#19-40 Rall v. Tribune 365 LLC, S254282. (B284566; 31 Cal.App.5th 479; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC613703.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order granting a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#19-33 Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., S253593. (9th Cir. No. 17-16452; 913 F.3d 923; Northern District of California No. 5:17-cv-00447-NC)
#19-33 Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., S253593. (9th Cir. No. 17-16452; 913 F.3d 923; Northern District of California No. 5:17-cv-00447-NC) Request under California Rules of Court rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending
#19-32 Stancil v. Superior Court, S253783. (A156100; nonpublished order; San Mateo County Superior Court; 18AD000039.)
#19-32 Stancil v. Superior Court, S253783. (A156100; nonpublished order; San Mateo County Superior Court; 18AD000039.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. The court issued an order to show cause and limited review to the following issue:
#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.)
#19-31 Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, S253677. (D071865; 29 Cal.App.5th 1968; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00012605-CU-OE-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case includes the following issue: Can employers utilize practices upheld in the
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2019 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.