Garcia-Rojas v. Franchise Tax Bd., S297035.
#26-131 Garcia-Rojas v. Franchise Tax Bd., S297035. (A172054; 120 Cal.App.5th 347; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC23606654.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case presents the following issue: Can a
Taduran v. James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, Inc., S297762.
#26-134 Taduran v. James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, Inc., S297762. (G064718; 121 Cal.App.5th 197, mod. 121 Cal.App.5th 383a; Orange County Superior Court; 302017-00934037.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, S297183.
#26-127 Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, S297183. (B336071; 120 Cal.App.5th 640; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCP00720.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action
Mayor v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S287261.
#24-234 Mayor v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S287261. (A169465; 104 Cal.App.5th 713, mod. 104 Cal.App.5th 1297; Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board; ADJ10036954.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate in a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board proceeding. This
Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchos Water, S289391.
#25-110 Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchos Water, S289391. (E078348; 108 Cal.App.5th 62, mod. 108 Cal.App.5th 666c; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVDS1600180.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings.
NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles, S296822.
#26-118 NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles, S296822. (G064487; 119 Cal.App.5th 1200; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00910991.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded with directions. The issue to be briefed and argued is
Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court, S288176.
#25-44 Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court, S288176. Original proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted. This case presents the following issue: Does the prohibition on electronic recording of certain proceedings
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952.
#25-148 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952. (B335686; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV14351.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a claimant
Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, S287946.
#25-1 Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, S287946. (B327745; 105 Cal.App.5th 913; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 19STCV11540.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Is a settlement offer
L.A. County Employees Retirement Association v. County of L.A., S286264.
#24-196 Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264. (B326977; 102 Cal.App.5th 1167; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCP03475.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.