California Supreme Court Watch

Dec 09, 2020
#19-139 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water Agency, S257009. (C082079; 36 Cal.App.5th 279, mod. 37 Cal.App.5th 164a; Amador County Superior Court; 16CV9564.)

#19-139 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water Agency, S257009. (C082079; 36 Cal.App.5th 279, mod. 37 Cal.App.5th 164a; Amador County Superior Court; 16CV9564.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision

Dec 09, 2020
#18-154 Coston v. Stanislaus County, S251721.

#18-154 Coston v. Stanislaus County, S251721. (F074209; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 201656.) Case transferred for reconsideration in light of Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479. Transferred to CA 5: 12/09/2020

Dec 09, 2020
#18-153 California Water Impact Network v. County of San Luis Obispo, S251056.

#18-153 California Water Impact Network v. County of San Luis Obispo, S251056. (B283846; 25 Cal.App.5th 666; San Luis Obispo County Superior Court; 16CVP- 0195.) Case transferred for reconsideration in light of Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479.

Oct 19, 2020
#20-310 Pico Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Santa Monica, S263972.

#20-310 Pico Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Santa Monica, S263972. (B295935; 51 Cal.App.5th 1002; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC616804.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court directed the parties to brief the following issue:

Oct 19, 2020
#20-140 Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court, S260846.

#20-140 Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court, S260846. (A157143; 46 Cal.App.5th 109; San Francisco County Superior Court; 13035657, 13035658) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Facebook, Inc. v.

Oct 12, 2020
#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180.

#20-249 Boermeester v. Carry, S263180. (B290675; 49 Cal.App.5th 682; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS170473.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issue: Does the common law right

Oct 12, 2020
#20-307 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Bay Area Toll Authority, S263835.

#20-307 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Bay Area Toll Authority, S263835. (A157598, A157972; 51 Cal.App.5th 435; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC18567860, CPF18516276.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision

Sep 28, 2020
#20-275 Segal v. ASICS America, S263569.

#20-275 Segal v. ASICS America, S263569. (B299184; 50 Cal.App.5th 659; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC597769.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a post-judgment order in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: May a party recover costs

Sep 21, 2020
#20-271 Domondo v. Three Olives Inc., S263701.

#20-271 Domondo v. Three Olives Inc., S263701. (B292561; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles; BC641464.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., S258019 (#19-173), which

Sep 14, 2020
#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309.

#20-260 Horne v. Ahern Rentals, S263309. (B299605; 50 Cal.App.5th 192; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC675950.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc., S252796 (#19-09),

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More