NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles, S296822.
#26-118 NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles, S296822. (G064487; 119 Cal.App.5th 1200; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00910991.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded with directions. The issue to be briefed and argued is
Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court, S288176.
#25-44 Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court, S288176. Original proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted. This case presents the following issue: Does the prohibition on electronic recording of certain proceedings
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952.
#25-148 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952. (B335686; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV14351.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a claimant
Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, S287946.
#25-1 Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, S287946. (B327745; 105 Cal.App.5th 913; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 19STCV11540.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Is a settlement offer
L.A. County Employees Retirement Association v. County of L.A., S286264.
#24-196 Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264. (B326977; 102 Cal.App.5th 1167; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCP03475.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)
Gilead Tenofovir Cases, S283862.
#24-77 Gilead Tenofovir Cases, S283862. (A165558; 98 Cal.App.5th 911, mod. 99 Cal.App.5th 196a; San Francisco County Superior Court; CJC19005043.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted in part and denied in part a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following
Fox Paine & Co., LLC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., S287404.
#24-232 Fox Paine & Co., LLC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., S287404. (A168803; 104 Cal.App.5th 1034; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC17557275.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed judgments in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) Where
Ventura County Employees’ Retirement Assn. v. Criminal Justice Attorneys Assn. of Ventura County, S283978.
#24-71 Ventura County Employees’ Retirement Assn. v. Criminal Justice Attorneys Assn. of Ventura County, S283978. (B325277; 98 Cal.App.5th 1119; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; VENCI00546574.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following
Conservatorship of E.A., S287241.
#24-231 Conservatorship of E.A., S287241. (A169299; nonpublished opinion; Contra Costa County Superior Court; P2000896.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a conservatorship proceeding. This case presents the following issue: Must a conservatee demonstrate prejudice to establish that a 362-day
Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants’ Medical Group, Inc., S290188.
#25-146 Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants’ Medical Group, Inc., S290188. (D085025; 109 Cal.App.5th 621; Riverside County Superior Court; CVRI2303683.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is a voluntary
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.