#24-257 J.O. v. Superior Court, S287285. (C102071; nonpublished order; San Joaquin County Superior Court; STKMHLPSC20160000110.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate in a conservatorship proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief
#26-90 Shin v. Aya Healthcare, S296243. (A173533; nonpublished opinion; Alameda County Superior Court; 24CV072248.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. Petition for review granted; briefing deferred: 5/27/2026 The court ordered
#26-89 Gerlach v. Zara USA, Inc., S295800. (B343994; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 24STCV20987.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. Petition for review granted; briefing deferred: 5/27/2026 The
#26-85 Ehrenkranz v. San Francisco Zen Center, S296143. (A171527; 118 Cal.App.5th 977; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC22602048.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed orders in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Lorenzo v. San Francisco Zen
#23-163 Basith v. Lithia Motors, Inc., S280258. (B316098; 90 Cal.App.5th 951; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV01725.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a petition to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision
#24-211 J.M. v. Illuminate Education, Inc., S286699. (B327683; 103 Cal.App.5th 1125; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00567324-CU-MC-VTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case presents the following issue: Is a company
#26-82 Performance Marketing LLC v. Thor Motor Coach, S295827. (B336862; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23NWCV01672.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action. The court ordered briefing in Diaz and Performance Marketing deferred pending decision in Lathrop v.
#26-81 Diaz v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S295851. (B339037; 118 Cal.App.5th 589; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23NWCV01867.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a
#26-80 Chi v. Department of Motor Vehicles, S296201. (A172237; 119 Cal.App.5th 473; Alameda County Superior Court; 24CV067384.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Romane v.
#26-77 Cervantes v. Bianco, S295866. Original proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted. This case presents the following issue: Are petitioners entitled to writ relief directing that cast ballots be returned to
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.