Holland v. Silverscreen Healthcare, Inc., S285429.
#24-153 Holland v. Silverscreen Healthcare, Inc., S285429. (B323237; 101 Cal.App.5th 1125; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22STCV01945.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: In
Ayers v. FCA US, LLC, S284486.
#24-82 Ayers v. FCA US, LLC, S284486. (B315884; 99 Cal.App.5th 1280; Los Angeles County Superior Court; JCCP4884.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action and remanded with directions. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Madrigal
S.C. v. County of Fresno, S291224.
#25-286 S.C. v. County of Fresno, S291224. (F088080; nonpublished opinion; Fresno County Superior Court; 22CECG03629.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in K.C. v. County of Merced, S290435 (#25-208),
In re B.M., S291525.
#25-279 In re B.M., S291525. (B339378; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 24CCJP01914A.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed appeal as moot in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re S.R., S285759 (#24-165), which
Romane v. Department of Motor Vehicles, S291093.
#25-274 Romane v. Department of Motor Vehicles, S291093. (D083569; 110 Cal.App.5th 1002; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2023-00017624-CU-WMCTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate and remanded for further proceedings. The court limited
Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498.
#24-98 Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498. (B327524; 99 Cal.App.5th 1319; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 20PSCV00827.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following issue: Does the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §
Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com., S283614.
#24-63 Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com., S283614. (A167721; 98 Cal.App.5th 20, mod. 98 Cal.App.5th 659e; Public Utilities Commission; 2212056.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a decision of the Public Utilities Commission. This case presents the following issues:
In re Ja.O., S280572.
#23-153 In re Ja.O., S280572. (E079651; 91 Cal.App.5th 672; San Bernardino County Superior Court; J291035.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. This case presents the following issue: Does the duty of a child welfare agency to
Gutierrez v. Tostado, S283128.
#24-59 Gutierrez v. Tostado, S283128. (H049983; 97 Cal.App.5th 786; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 20CV361400.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the one-year statute of limitations in the Medical
Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., S291614.
#25-270 Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., S291614. (B338047; 111 Cal.App.5th 516; Ventura County Superior Court; 2023CUOE015333.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.