California Supreme Court Watch

Jul 22, 2015
#15-129 BNSF Railway Co. v. Superior Court, S226284

#15-129 BNSF Railway Co. v. Superior Court, S226284.  (B260798; 235 Cal.App.4th 591; BC552015.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, S221038 (#14-133),

Jul 15, 2015
#15-120 Flethez v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Assn., S226779

#15-120 Flethez v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Assn., S226779. (D066959; 236 Cal.App.4th 65; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVDS1212542.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issue: If

Jun 10, 2015
#15-70 Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. v. American Asphalt South, Inc., S225398

#15-70 Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. v. American Asphalt South, Inc., S225398. (B255558; 234 Cal.App.4th 748; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1308832.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) In the context

Jun 10, 2015
Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara, S225589

 Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara, S225589.  (B253474; 234 Cal.App.4th 925; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 1383959.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is the City of Santa

Apr 29, 2015
#15-53 Frealy v. Reynolds, S224985

#15-53 Frealy v. Reynolds, S224985. (9th Cir. No. 12-60068; 779 F.3d 1028; Central District of California; BAP No. 11-1433, Bankr. Case No. 09-14039-MJ, Adversary Case No. 09-01205-MJ.) Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in

Mar 18, 2015
#15-25 Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLC, S223536

#15-25 Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLC, S223536. (A138306; 231 Cal.App.4th 805; Marin County Superior Court; CIV081957.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying attorney fees in a civil action. This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the

Mar 11, 2015
#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603

#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603. (D063288; 231 Cal.App.4th 1056, mod. 231 Cal.App.4th 1437a; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00101593-CU-TT-CTL, 37-2011-00101660-CU-TTCTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review

Jan 14, 2015
#15-01 926 North Ardmore Avenue v. County of Los Angeles, S222329

#15-01 926 North Ardmore Avenue v. County of Los Angeles, S222329. (B248536; 229 Cal.App.4th 1335; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC476670.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does Revenue and Taxation

Dec 10, 2014
#14-140 Lynch v. California Coastal Com., S221980

#14-140 Lynch v. California Coastal Com., S221980.  (D064120; 229 Cal.App.4th 658; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00058666-CU-WM-NC.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issues: (1) Did plaintiffs,

Dec 10, 2014
#14-139 Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472

#14-139 Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472. (A139222, A139235; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgments in actions for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More