California Supreme Court Watch
#15-152 Friends of the Santa Clara River v. County of Los Angeles, S226749
#15-152 Friends of the Santa Clara River v. County of Los Angeles, S226749. (B256125; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS136549.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred
#15-150 Williams v. Superior Court, S227228
#15-150 Williams v. Superior Court, S227228. (B259967; 236 Cal.App.4th 1151; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC503806.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. This case presents the following issues: (1) Is the plaintiff in a representative
#15-133 American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California v. Superior Court, S227106
#15-133 American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California v. Superior Court, S227106. (B259392; 236 Cal.App 4th 673; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS143004.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following issue:
#15-129 BNSF Railway Co. v. Superior Court, S226284
#15-129 BNSF Railway Co. v. Superior Court, S226284. (B260798; 235 Cal.App.4th 591; BC552015.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, S221038 (#14-133),
#15-120 Flethez v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Assn., S226779
#15-120 Flethez v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Assn., S226779. (D066959; 236 Cal.App.4th 65; San Bernardino County Superior Court; CIVDS1212542.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issue: If
#15-70 Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. v. American Asphalt South, Inc., S225398
#15-70 Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. v. American Asphalt South, Inc., S225398. (B255558; 234 Cal.App.4th 748; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1308832.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) In the context
Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara, S225589
Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara, S225589. (B253474; 234 Cal.App.4th 925; Santa Barbara County Superior Court; 1383959.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is the City of Santa
#15-53 Frealy v. Reynolds, S224985
#15-53 Frealy v. Reynolds, S224985. (9th Cir. No. 12-60068; 779 F.3d 1028; Central District of California; BAP No. 11-1433, Bankr. Case No. 09-14039-MJ, Adversary Case No. 09-01205-MJ.) Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in
#15-25 Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLC, S223536
#15-25 Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLC, S223536. (A138306; 231 Cal.App.4th 805; Marin County Superior Court; CIV081957.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order denying attorney fees in a civil action. This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the
#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603
#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603. (D063288; 231 Cal.App.4th 1056, mod. 231 Cal.App.4th 1437a; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00101593-CU-TT-CTL, 37-2011-00101660-CU-TTCTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
© 2020 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.