TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233.
#24-180 TRC Operating Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc., S286233. (F083724; 102 Cal.App.5th 1040; Kern County Superior Court; S1500-CV-282520_JEB.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed orders in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court limited review to
Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952.
#25-148 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. LLC v. City of Carson, S289952. (B335686; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV14351.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a claimant
Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants’ Medical Group, Inc., S290188.
#25-146 Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants’ Medical Group, Inc., S290188. (D085025; 109 Cal.App.5th 621; Riverside County Superior Court; CVRI2303683.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is a voluntary
Rodriguez v. Packers Sanitation Services LTD., LLC, S290182.
#25-142 Rodriguez v. Packers Sanitation Services LTD., LLC, S290182. (D083400; 109 Cal.App.5th 69; Imperial County Superior Court; ECU002252.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending
In re Z.G., S289430.
#25-131 In re Z.G., S289430. (E083710; nonpublished opinion; San Bernardino County Superior Court; J286808.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: Can parental rights properly be terminated pursuant to
Hearn v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., S289581.
#25-130 Hearn v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., S289581. (A167742, A167991; 108 Cal.App.5th 301; Napa County Superior Court; 20CV000391.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to
In re A.G., S289441.
#25-128 In re A.G., S289441. (E084563; nonpublished order; San Bernardino County Superior Court; J286808.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court issued an order to show cause why the
Whitehead v. City of Oakland, S284303.
#24-81 Whitehead v. City of Oakland, S284303. (A164483; 99 Cal.App.5th 775; Alameda County Superior Court; RG18896233.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does a liability release agreement between a bicyclist
Hardy v. Forest River, Inc., S289309.
#25-127 Hardy v. Forest River, Inc., S289309. (B331450; 108 Cal.App.5th 450; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22NWCV01656.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in
New England Country Foods, LLC v. Vanlaw Food Products, Inc., S282968.
#24-23 New England Country Foods, LLC v. Vanlaw Food Products, Inc., S282968. (9th Cir. No. 22-55432; 87 F.3d 1016; Central District of California; D.C. No. 8:21-cv01060-DOC-ADS.) Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.