California Supreme Court Watch

Mar 11, 2015
#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603

#15-18 Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments, S223603. (D063288; 231 Cal.App.4th 1056, mod. 231 Cal.App.4th 1437a; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00101593-CU-TT-CTL, 37-2011-00101660-CU-TTCTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review

Jan 14, 2015
#15-01 926 North Ardmore Avenue v. County of Los Angeles, S222329

#15-01 926 North Ardmore Avenue v. County of Los Angeles, S222329. (B248536; 229 Cal.App.4th 1335; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC476670.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does Revenue and Taxation

Dec 10, 2014
#14-140 Lynch v. California Coastal Com., S221980

#14-140 Lynch v. California Coastal Com., S221980.  (D064120; 229 Cal.App.4th 658; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00058666-CU-WM-NC.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issues: (1) Did plaintiffs,

Dec 10, 2014
#14-139 Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472

#14-139 Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472. (A139222, A139235; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgments in actions for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following

Oct 29, 2014
#14-125 Dane v City of Santa Rosa, S221341

#14-125 Dane v City of Santa Rosa, S221341.  (A138355; nonpublished opinion; Sonoma County Superior Court; SCV253003.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Wheatherford v. City of San Rafael,

Sep 17, 2014
#14-108 Lewis v. Superior Court, S219811

#14-108 Lewis v. Superior Court, S219811.  (B252032; 226 Cal.App.4th 933; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS139289.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case includes the following issues: (1) Do a physician’s

Sep 10, 2014
#14-105 Wheatherford v. City of San Rafael, S219567

#14-105 Wheatherford v. City of San Rafael, S219567. (A138949; 226 Cal.App.4th 460; Marin County Superior Court; CIV1300112.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a plaintiff have paid or be liable

Aug 20, 2014
#14-97 Haver v. BNSF Railway Co., S219919

#14-97 Haver v. BNSF Railway Co., S219919.  (B246527; 226 Cal.App.4th 1104, mod. 226 Cal.App.4th 1376b; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC435551.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. Haver and Kesner present the following issue: If an

Jul 16, 2014
#14-80 Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., S218734

#14-80 Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., S218734.  (B246606; 225 Cal.App.4th 427; Los Angeles County Superior Court; SC110477.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: When the buyer and the

Jul 16, 2014
#14-76 Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California, Inc., S218497

#14-76 Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California, Inc., S218497.  (B238867; 225 Cal.App.4th 237; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC449056.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More