In re Ja.O., S280572.
#23-153 In re Ja.O., S280572. (E079651; 91 Cal.App.5th 672; San Bernardino County Superior Court; J291035.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. This case presents the following issue: Does the duty of a child welfare agency to
Gutierrez v. Tostado, S283128.
#24-59 Gutierrez v. Tostado, S283128. (H049983; 97 Cal.App.5th 786; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 20CV361400.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the one-year statute of limitations in the Medical
Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., S291614.
#25-270 Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., S291614. (B338047; 111 Cal.App.5th 516; Ventura County Superior Court; 2023CUOE015333.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. The court
EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court, S282521.
#23-247 EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court, S282521. (D081670; 95 Cal.App.5th 890, mod. 95 Cal.App.5th 1320a; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2022-00015228-CUBT-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate in a civil action. This case presents the following
Sanders v. Superior Court, S291437.
#25-254 Sanders v. Superior Court, S291437. (B340707; 110 Cal.App.5th 1304; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV31165.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498
Bring Back the Kern v. City of Bakersfield, S290840.
#25-242 Bring Back the Kern v. City of Bakersfield, S290840. (F087503, F087549, F087558, F087560, F087702, F087487; 110 Cal.App.5th 322; Kern County Superior Court; BCV-22-103220.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed orders in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case
Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC, S291199.
#25-241 Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC, S291199. (B335445; 110 Cal.App.5th 932; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23STCV05372.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Leeper v. Shipt, Inc.,
11640 Woodbridge Condominium Homeowners’ Assn. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, S290750.
#25-222 11640 Woodbridge Condominium Homeowners’ Assn. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, S290750. (B333848; 110 Cal.App.5th 211; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22STCV00778.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does a provision
Brown v. City of Inglewood, S280773.
#23-187 Brown v. City of Inglewood, S280773. (B320658; 92 Cal.App.5th 1256; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV30604.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part an order in a civil action. The court limited review to the following
Ford Motor Warranty Cases, S279969.
#23-148 Ford Motor Warranty Cases, S279969. (B312261; 89 Cal.App.5th 1324; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC596216.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The court limited review to the following issue: Do manufacturers’ express or
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.