Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Buchan v. United States Cycling Federation (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 134
Resisted Supreme Court review of decision validating release signed by participant in elite bicycle race
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 647
Court of Appeal barred plaintiff from designating defendant’s withdrawn witness and disqualified plaintiff’s attorney for ex parte communications with witness
Shaw v. Lindheim (9th Cir. 1990) 919 F.2d 1353
Explanation of process for analyzing copyright infringement claims
Weinberg v. Parkinson’s Disease Foundation (Apr. 24, 1990, B040520)
Interpretation of ambiguous residuary bequest in will
Wood v. Kessler, 1989 Cal. LEXIS 2145
Business dispute – constitutional right to jury trial
George v. Internat. Society for Krishna Consciousness (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 729
Amending tort judgment to add additional religious corporations while appeal from original judgment was pending
Desserts Without Guilt, Inc. v. Coffee Barrel (9th Cir. 1989) 868 F.2d 1272 [mem. disp.]
Parol evidence rule barred evidence to explain and supplement terms of contract
Honda Motor Co. v. Salzman (Alaska 1988) 751 P.2d 489
Terminating discovery sanctions against corporate defendant
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court (1987, A037331)
Writ proceeding exploring insurer’s duties in case of conflicting interests between named and additional insureds
Preston v. Family Health Program (1986, G001199)
Whether noneconomic damages in arbitration award could exceed $250,000
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.