Cases

GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.

114 Case Results
Filter

HBI Construction, Inc. v. Superior Court (Sept. 7, 2011 E053977) 2011 WL 3904639

Court of Appeal grants writ in part, affirming equitable apportionment of mechanic’s lien

2011

Leontaritis v. Koursaris (June 30, 2011, B219095) 2011 WL 2803097

Appeal succeeds: default judgment vacated and service challenge granted

Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Superior Court (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1263 (amicus)

Court of Appeal confirms broad scope of attorney-client and work product protection

2011

Ruttlen v. County of Los Angeles (Mar. 30, 2011, B223345) 2011 WL 1138420

Anti-SLAPP attorney fee award for County of Los Angeles affirmed

2010

Parks Legal Defense Fund v. City of Huntington Beach (Dec. 13, 2010, G043109) 2010 WL 5066160

Court of Appeal ruling revives senior center project in Huntington Beach

2010

Torihara v. Regents of University of California (May 18, 2010, B215801) 2010 WL 1972262

Court of Appeal holds that wheeling a patient between testing rooms in a hospital is the provision of health care for purposes of the statute of limitations

2010

Arellano v. Regents of University of California (Feb. 10, 2010, G041485) 2010 WL 455396

Court of Appeal affirms order denying reconsideration of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to file opposition to original motion

Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 980

Court of Appeal reverses dismissal of trade secret misappropriation claims

2009

Wright v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (Dec. 17, 2009, A123721) 2009 WL 4882680

Court of Appeal affirms that standing to assert a wrongful death claim is purely statutory and determined as of the date of death

Bioquest Venture Leasing Company-A, N.V. v. VivoRx Autoimmune, Inc. (Nov. 5, 2009, B201454) 2009 WL 3719534

Court of Appeal reverses multi-million dollar judgment against GMSR clients on ground that California, not Massachusetts law, determines the applicable statute of limitations