Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Ferra v. Gilmore (Aug. 20, 2021, B303592) 2021 WL 3700420 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal reinstates GMSR’s client’s claims seeking return of $1.6 million
Meridian Financial Services, Inc. v. Phan (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 657
Court of Appeal affirms defense summary judgment based on issue preclusion as to the appellant’s unclean hands
Law Finance Group, LLC v. Key (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 307
Court of Appeal orders confirmation of arbitration award for GMSR’s client, finding the respondent missed a jurisdictional deadline to seek to vacate it
Jean-Louis v. City of Riverside (9th Cir. 2021) 850 Fed.Appx. 548
Ninth Circuit affirms judgment for GMSR’s clients, finding appellant’s argument forfeited and without merit
Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (March 22, 2021, B292794) 2021 WL 1084783 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal finds physician failed to exhaust administrative remedies in medical peer review matter
Berroteran v. Superior Court (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 518
Court of Appeal grants petition for writ of mandate, vacating exclusion of key deposition evidence
Wood v. Sparks Enterprises LP (Oct. 2, 2019, G056181) 2019 WL 4854837 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms judgment for GMSR’s property owner client
Daniels v. Southern California Edison Co. (July 8, 2019, E069183) 2019 WL 2912505 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms judgment for GMSR’s utility client, finding no basis for liability following firefighter’s accident
Etelaei v. First General Bank (June 18, 2019, B287186) 2019 WL 2511405 [nonpublished opinion]
GMSR’s client faced loss of her home on account of an unauthorized home equity loan from which she received nothing. Judgment for the lender reversed
Coastline RE Holdings Corp. v. Cunningham (June 7, 2019, C076994) 2019 WL 2402272 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms $3.9 million judgment on commercial guaranty, holding that federal law bars guarantor’s assertion of “sham guaranty” defense
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.