Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Conrado v. CLS Landscaping Management, Inc., et al. (Nov. 27, 2023, D081551) 2023 WL 8178728 [nonpublished opinion]
In a motor vehicle negligence case, the Court of Appeal reverses judgment and $500,000 cost-of-proof attorney fee award
L.S. v. City of Glendale (Nov. 21, 2023, B319602) 2023 WL 8046891 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for GMSR’s City client, finding no dangerous condition of public property
Hedding-Kelton v. Madrigal (Nov. 1, 2023, C095876) 2023 WL 7175716 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal reverses judgment, ordering Proposition 51 apportionment retrial
AIX Specialty Insurance Company v. Timed Out, LLC (Oct. 5, 2023, B320255) 2023 WL 6475087 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, holding that insurance policy does not cover infringement of models’ rights of publicity
Inzunza et al. v. Naranjo et al. (2023) 94 Cal.App.5th 736
GMSR persuades Court of Appeal to set aside $7.619 million judgment against its client
Nigel B. v. Burbank Unified School District (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 64
GMSR wins reversal and remand of $1.75 million judgment against school district, with instructions to hold trial on apportionment of fault
Pham et al. v. Southern California Edison Company (May 2, 2023, B316026) 2023 WL 3189810 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, finding no duty in case alleging inadequate streetlighting by public utility
Orcutt v. MacDonald (Mar. 16, 2023, B319016) 2023 WL 2532025 [nonpublished opinion]
GMSR wins affirmance of anti-SLAPP order, striking malicious prosecution claim against individual who assisted police officers
Campbell v. Budd (Oct. 18, 2022, B306687) 2022 WL 10252427 [nonpublished opinion]
GMSR secures affirmance of summary judgment for vacation-rental owners
Beaudreau v. Burnham USA Equities, Inc. et al. (Aug. 23, 2022, G059971) 2022 WL 3593351 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal reaffirms that businesses with perpendicular parking generally have no duty to protect against curb-jumping vehicles
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.