Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164.
#24-259 Sellers v. Superior Court, S287164. (C100036; 104 Cal.App.5th 468; Sacramento County Superior Court; 21FE018661.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate. This case presents the following issues: (1) Does the presence of 0.36 grams of loose
Taylor v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S294365.
#26-17 Taylor v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S294365. (D083730; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2023-00024862-CU-BC-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action and remanded with directions. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Lathrop
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Schofield, S294428.
#26-9 Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Schofield, S294428. (B342783; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 23VECV05661.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action and remanded for further proceedings. This case presents the following issue: Must a
Illinois Midwest Ins. Agency LLC v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S294463.
#26-6 Illinois Midwest Ins. Agency LLC v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S294463. (B344044; 115 Cal.App.5th 1168; Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board; ADJ11532204.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal annulled and remanded the decision in a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board proceeding. This case presents the
City of Oxnard v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, S287599.
#24-242 City of Oxnard v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, S287599. (B328083; nonpublished opinion; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00563903-CU-MCVTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in City of San Jose
City of Escondido v. Fawcett, S286239.
#24-167 City of Escondido v. Fawcett, S286239. (D082525; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2022-00025425-CU-PT-NC.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in City of San Jose v. Howard
City of Gilroy v. Superior Court, S282937.
#24-32 City of Gilroy v. Superior Court, S282937. (H049552; 96 Cal.App.5th 818, mod. 97 Cal.App.5th 462a; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 20CV362347.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. City of Gilroy and Law Foundation of
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley v. Superior Court, S282950.
#24-33 Law Foundation of Silicon Valley v. Superior Court, S282950. (H049554; 96 Cal.App.5th 818, mod. 97 Cal.App.5th 462a; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 20CV362347.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. City of Gilroy and Law
T.L. v. San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, S294146.
#26-4 T.L. v. San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, S294146. (D084870; nonpublished opinion; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2021-00014628CU-PO-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in K.C.
Wonacott v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S293617.
#25-358 Wonacott v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc., S293617. (C099248; nonpublished opinion; Butte County Superior Court; 22CV01555.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed orders in a civil action and remanded with directions. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Lathrop v. Thor
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.