#23-32 Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc., S277628. (D079364, D079369; 84 Cal.App.5th 1002; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2019-00059601-CU-OR-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Must a homeowner exhaust administrative
#24-165 In re S.R., S285759. (B326812; nonpublished order; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22CCJP03750A, 22CCJP03750B.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed appeal as moot in a juvenile dependency proceeding. This case presents the following issues: (1) When a juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings
#23-27 Zhang v. Superior Court, S277736. (B314386; 85 Cal.App.5th 167; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV19442.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1) If an employer
#25-330 City of Salinas v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., S293212. (H052062; 113 Cal.App.5th 801; Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board; ADJ14038029.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the decision in a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in
#25-329 Gogal v. Deng, S292779. (D084158; 112 Cal.App.5th 1193; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2022-00017670-CU-NP-NC.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed a post-judgment order in a civil action and remanded with directions. The court directed the parties to brief the following issues:
#24-208 Costa-Fleeson v. Americor Funding, S286683. (G062962; nonpublished opinion; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2023-01305561.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498 (#24-98), which presents
#25-254 Sanders v. Superior Court, S291437. (B340707; 110 Cal.App.5th 1304; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV31165.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498
#25-106 Colon-Perez v. Security Industry Specialists, Inc., S289702. (A168297; 108 Cal.App.5th 403; Alameda County Superior Court; 21CV004546.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498 (#24-98),
#24-155 Solis v. Sohnen Enterprises, S285733. (B323296; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV26265.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action. The court ordered briefing in Solis deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court, S284498
#24-154 Hernandez v. Sohnen Enterprises, S285696. (B323303; 102 Cal.App.5th 222; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV26283.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order in a civil action. The court ordered briefing in Hernandez deferred pending decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court,
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.