Finding serious discovery misconduct, the Court of Appeal orders new trial and requires automaker to pay trial and appellate attorney’s fees to GMSR’s client
GMSR’s consumer client sued an automaker under California’s lemon law and alleged that his car had engine defects. During discovery, the consumer demanded production of documents about the automaker’s internal investigations and communications with government agencies regarding alleged engine defects. The automaker swore that it
Court of Appeal embraces GMSR’s statutory analysis, reinforcing consumer protections under the Song-Beverly Act
Two consumers purchased a defective new car, and the manufacturer failed to repair it. The consumers requested repurchase under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, which establishes a precise statutory formula for repurchases and mandates prompt manufacturer compliance. The manufacturer refused. Then, an accident occurred. The
Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict and judgment, finding any alleged evidentiary error was harmless
At midnight, a towing company’s driver collided with a pedestrian on a bridge in Indio. After the accident, the towing company obtained a defense verdict at trial. The jury found that the defendants were not negligent. On appeal, Plaintiffs attacked the trial court’s admission of
Court of Appeal affirms declaratory judgment, saving GMSR’s client tens of millions in rent
GMSR’s client, VMA Palomar, LLC (VMA), is the commercial tenant under a 42-year ground lease with landlord Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Long Beach (FMT). The monthly rent was based on the property’s fair market value in the 1970s, when the lease began. The
Ninth Circuit reverses judgment against GMSR’s client and reinstates its $25.7 million verdict
GMSR’s client EchoSpan alleged that a competitor willfully and maliciously appropriated multiple trade secrets and sought more than $23 million in damages based on the competitor’s unjust enrichment. A federal jury unanimously agreed regarding one of the trade secrets and awarded $11.7 million in unjust
GMSR prevents compelled disclosure of privileged documents via writ review
Writ petitions can provide valuable relief when a trial court issues an erroneous order in the middle of litigation. This proved to be the case recently for a GMSR client. During discovery, the client faced an order to produce several documents that it had asserted
GMSR wins insurance contribution case in Oregon Supreme Court
GMSR’s client Continental Casualty Company paid over $25 million in defense costs for an industrial insured facing environmental claims at the Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Continental sued its co-insurers for contribution. A few months before trial, one of the defendant insurers moved for dismissal, claiming
Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of GMSR’s clients, rejecting fraud and misrepresentation claims stemming from a $30+ million commercial real estate deal
Two plaintiffs—a cosmetics company and a related entity—sued GMSR’s clients, a large property developer and two other defendants. Plaintiffs alleged fraud and misrepresentation arising from a multimillion-dollar commercial property sale in the City of Corona. The trial court granted summary judgment against one of the
GMSR wins reversal of defense judgment and remand for new trial of carrier’s $5 million fraud claim
Federal Insurance Company and GMSR client Truck Insurance Exchange were liability insurers for the same insured. In a previous lawsuit, Federal sued Truck for reimbursement on the premise that Federal’s duty to defend under the insured’s excess policy depended on the exhaustion of the primary
Ninth Circuit affirms summary judgment for GMSR’s insurer client
GMSR represented Steadfast Insurance Company on appeal in a dispute with another insurer suing on the assigned rights of Steadfast’s insured. Steadfast’s insured, a construction company, allegedly built defective roofs. Its insurance broker failed to timely report one of the claims to Steadfast—so the broker’s
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2026 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.