Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P. (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 987
GMSR’s client prevails in a published decision that comprehensively analyzes the governing principles and application of the parol evidence rule
Main Line Pictures, Inc. v. Basinger (Sept. 22, 1994, B077509) 1994 WL 814244 [nonpublished opinion]
Judgment reversed because prejudicially ambiguous jury instruction
Farkas v. Lazerson (1994, B070545)
Contract for sale of ophthalmology practice properly cancelled
Northridge Lumber Co. v. Osborne (July 26, 1991, B053868)
Interpretation of real estate sale agreement
Desserts Without Guilt, Inc. v. Coffee Barrel (9th Cir. 1989) 868 F.2d 1272 [mem. disp.]
Parol evidence rule barred evidence to explain and supplement terms of contract
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.