Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products, S285618.
#24-140 Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products, S285618. (B327278; nonpublished opinion; Ventura County Superior Court; 56-2022-00571822-CU-OEVTA.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Turrieta v. Lyft, Inc., S271721 (#22-03), which
In re Z.C., S277229.
#22-317 In re Z.C., S277229. (C094803; nonpublished opinion; Yolo County Superior Court; JV20193243.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile court proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred in In re E.T. and In re Z.C. pending decision in In re
In re E.T., S277264.
#22-316 In re E.T., S277264. (B315104; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 19CCJP05355.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile court proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred in In re E.T. and In re Z.C. pending decision in In
Krug v. Board of Trustees of California State University, S282131.
#23-255 Krug v. Board of Trustees of California State University, S282131. (B320588; 94 Cal.App.5th 1158; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCV14538.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Stone
In re A.G., S285658.
#24-166 In re A.G., S285658. (B331398; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22CCJP02589.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending finality of the decision in In re Dezi C. (2024)
In re Ryder S., S284423.
#24-96 In re Ryder S., S284423. (B330204; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 22CCJP01821.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22-254), which
In re X.R., S278928.
#23-74 In re X.R., S278928. (B318808; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 20CCJP05092A.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22 254),
In re D.D., S278070.
#23-38 In re D.D., S278070. (B319941; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 18CCJP02204.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed an order in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in In re Dezi C., S275578 (#22-254), which
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264.
#24-196 Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, S286264. (B326977; 102 Cal.App.5th 1167; Los Angeles County Superior Court; 21STCP03475.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issues: (1)
Richmond Shoreline Alliance v. City of Richmond, S278089.
#23-35 Richmond Shoreline Alliance v. City of Richmond, S278089. (A166004; nonpublished opinion; Contra Costa County Superior Court; MSN201967.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in
Who We Serve
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
GMSR represents insurers on appeal effectively and efficiently. We also collaborate with our clients and trial counsel on strategy for coverage, contribution and bad faith litigation before appeals begin.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
Orange County
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.