California Evidence Code section 1157 shields from civil discovery the records and proceedings of medical peer review committees. Based on this shield, a medical group facing a negligent hiring suit objected to several discovery requests that called for peer-review-related material. The trial court overruled the objection and ordered the medical group to respond to the requests.
GMSR filed a writ petition on behalf the medical group, asking the Court of Appeal to review the ruling on an interlocutory basis. The Court of Appeal has discretion in whether to consider such petitions, and most are summarily denied. Despite those long odds, here, after receiving additional briefing and amicus letters, the Court of Appeal considered the petition on the merits, and ordered the trial court to either (a) vacate its order and reconsider whether to compel discovery in light of the governing standards, or (b) explain why it should not be required to do so.
Click here to read the Court of Appeal, Second District Division Eight’s Order and Alternative Writ of Mandate: Facey Medical Group v. Superior Court (Aug. 30, 2022, B320470).
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.