Cedars-Sinai

Feb 28, 2017 Robin Meadow, Jeffrey E. Raskin Anti-SLAPP Law

GMSR Wins Affirmance Of Anti-SLAPP Ruling

Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (2017) 8 Cal.App.5th 1271. A physician sued a hospital and some doctors, alleging that the summary suspension of his medical staff privileges was motivated by retaliatory animus. The Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of the suit under the anti-SLAPP statute. On the first

Feb 28, 2017 Robin Meadow, Jeffrey E. Raskin Anti-SLAPP Law

Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Oct. 6, 2017, B263095) 2017 WL 4510849 [nonpublished opinion]

A physician sued a hospital and some doctors, alleging that the summary suspension of his medical staff privileges was motivated by retaliatory animus. The Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of the suit under the anti-SLAPP statute. On the first prong, it held that the claims arose out of

Jan 23, 2008 Robin Meadow, Alana H. Rotter Civil Procedure, Healthcare Law

Krishnan v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Jan. 23, 2008, B194755) 2008 WL 186652 [nonpublished opinion]

Defendants moved for summary judgment on a medical malpractice claim. Plaintiff filed his opposition more than a week late, asking the trial court to excuse the lateness because of an unspecified calendaring error by his counsel’s office. The trial court denied the request and granted

Feb 13, 2007 Robin Meadow

Tolwin v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Feb. 13, 2007, B184632) 2007 WL 451245 [nonpublished opinion]

Jens Koepke and Robin Meadow secured an affirmance in this medical staff privileges case. It arose from the summary suspension and eventual termination of staff privileges for a psychiatrist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, with a peer review process that lasted almost four years. The Court

Nov 17, 2004 Robin Meadow Healthcare Law

Frankel v. Cedars-Sinai Foundation (Nov. 17, 2004, B170399) 2004 WL 2601543 [nonpublished opinion]

Admissibility of evidence and various jury-trial issues in medical malpractice action

Aug 19, 2003 Civil Procedure

Bray v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 2003 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 7844

Dismissal as discovery sanction

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

COMMUNITY PRO BONO

As part of GMSR’s long-standing commitment to social justice and equality, GMSR provides pro bono appellate services to individuals and to community organizations on issues of concern.