McCormick-Gordon v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 2005 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 597

The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for GMSR’s client Cedars-Sinai in a medical malpractice action, holding that plaintiff’s expert, a general surgeon, could not testify to the standard of care about a specific urological procedure and rejecting application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine because the specific medical procedure was not a matter of common knowledge.

Case Briefs

  • McCormick-Gordon v Cedars-Sinai Medical Center RB - View Document
  • McCormick Gordon v Cedars Sinai Medical Center Opinion - View Document