GMSR’s client, a hospital, sought a writ of mandamus to challenge a trial court order enforcing a provision in a trial setting conference order which shortened the time limits for demanding exchange of expert witness lists.
It held that: (1) the issue would be reviewed by way of mandamus because of large number of litigants and attorneys were affected by the issue, and (2) the time limit set forth in statute for service of demand to exchange lists of expert witnesses permits no deviation.
The Court of Appeal issued a writ of mandate requiring the trial court to vacate its order denying petitioner’s motion to preclude the real parties in interest from calling experts, or alternatively to compel the real parties to designate and produce experts for deposition, and to enter a new and different order setting a trial date and compelling real parties to designate and produce experts for deposition within the time limits therefor provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 2037, subdivision (a).
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P: (310) 859-7811
© 2025 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.