Recent Wins

Nov 02, 2006 , Martin Stein
Age discrimination verdict against MTA is reversed

Fu v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transp. Authority, (2006) Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 10028 (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five (Los Angeles)) [unpublished]. Barbara Perry and Marty Stein secured a complete reversal here. The jury awarded the plaintiff $1,678,000 in damages, $57,961 in costs and

Dismissal of legal malpractice action affirmed

Shelden v. Grossman, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 8805 (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven (Los Angeles)) [unpublished]. Ted Xanders and Robin Meadow were responsible for the victory in this legal malpractice/fraud action against a law firm. The plaintiff alleged that the firm had

Sep 25, 2006 Carolyn Oill, Martin Stein
Plaintiff’s appeal dismissed as untimely

Wang v. Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 8459 (California Court of Appeal, First District, Division One (San Francisco)) [unpublished]. Carolyn Oill and Marty Stein represented GMSR’s client, a medical center. The plaintiff sued for allegedly “falsifying” her medical records. The trial

Attorney disqualification order reversed in first-impression case

Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 50 (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three (Los Angeles)) [published]. Marc Poster and Kent Richland secured this victory. The Court of Appeal held that the trial court had erred in disqualifying GMSR’s client

Aug 23, 2006 , Robin Meadow
Court rebuffs attempt to expand elder abuse liability

Pagarigan v. Greater Valley, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 7445 (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven (Los Angeles)) [unpublished]. Barbara Ravitz and Robin Meadow prevailed in this test case for expanding elder abuse liability beyond immediate caregivers. The Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal

Appellant dismisses appeal after GMSR files its respondent’s brief

Zand v. Old Republic, Case No. G035874 (California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three (Santa Ana)). Cindy Tobisman and Robin Meadow won without even having to obtain a court decision. The plaintiff alleged that GMSR’s client, a title insurer, negligently concluded that his consent

Aug 16, 2006 Carolyn Oill, Martin Stein
Dismissal of medical malpractice action affirmed

Burrus v. City of Los Angeles, (2006) U.S.App. LEXIS 21076 (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) [unpublished]. Lillie Hsu, Carolyn Oill and Marty Stein combined for this recent victory. In a memorandum decision, the Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the

Jul 24, 2006 Marc J. Poster
Affirmance of dismissal ends employment claim saga

Feied v. Regents of the University of California, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 6428 (California Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four (San Francisco)) [unpublished]. Marc Poster secured this victory in association with University counsel. A former University of California employee sought continuing retirement benefits even

Jun 22, 2006
Court of Appeal affirms award of appellate attorneys’ fees

Mir v. Iungerich & Spackman, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 5324 (California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three (Los Angeles)) [unpublished]. Peter Israel wrote the respondent’s brief in this case. The Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment for appellate fees in favor of GMSR’s client,

Jun 20, 2006 Robin Meadow, Carolyn Oill
Arbitration award affirmed against challenge that trial court erred in ordering case to arbitration

Meyerman v. Burgess, (2006) Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 5458, 5508 (California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two (Riverside)) [unpublished]. Carolyn Oill and Robin Meadow won this affirmance. The appeal sought to overturn a highly favorable arbitration award on the ground that the trial court erred

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
BUSINESSES

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More