Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
3500 Sepulveda, LLC v. Macy’s West Stores, Inc. (9th Cir. 2020) 980 F.3d 1317
In published opinion, Ninth Circuit revives building owners’ easement complaint previously dismissed on summary judgment
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (Nov. 19, 2020, B293479) 2020 WL 6792382 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirms judgment notwithstanding the verdict for water utility
Yu v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 636
In a published opinion, the Court of Appeal upholds GMSR client’s right to a new trial
B.Q. v. Dekok (9th Cir. 2020) 825 Fed.Appx. 533
Ninth Circuit affirms qualified immunity for teacher sued by student for violation of the Establishment Clause
Hawkins v. Southern Cal. Edison Co. (Oct. 8, 2020, B295675) 2020 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 6587 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal confirms that the Public Utilities Commission still has exclusive jurisdiction over claims alleging injury from electromagnetic fields
Rosenthal v. City of Oakland (Aug. 27, 2020, A156881) 2020 WL 5051440 [nonpublished opinion]
Court of Appeal affirmed grants for summary judgment for GMSR’s private landowner client
In re Marriage of DeSouza (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 25
The trial court’s finding that an ex-husband breached his fiduciary duty by failing to disclose material information about his bitcoin investments to his ex-wife was supported by substantial evidence
Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 1130
GMSR wins landmark decision on unfair competition, tortious interference with contract
Durment v. Burlington Insurance Company (9th Cir. 2020) 820 Fed.Appx. 561
Underlying this insurance bad faith dispute was a lawsuit involving alleged breaches of a joint venture agreement and an intellectual property agreement. The insurers failed to defend the policyholders against an amended complaint tendered to the insurers on the eve of trial. The policyholders then
Pankey v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. (June 24, 2020, D072779) [previously published at 51 Cal.App.5th 61]
Plaintiff filed a products liability claim against Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., after his son contracted a rare bacterial infection from a rat purchased at Petco. His son later died as a result of complications related to his infection. Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that Petco
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.