Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Kerins v. Hartley (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 1062
Availability of damages from health care provider for patient’s “fear of AIDS”
Sutton v. Earles (9th Cir. 1994) 26 F.3d 903
Loss of society damages from Navy injury; federal discretionary function immunity
Farkas v. Lazerson (1994, B070545)
Contract for sale of ophthalmology practice properly cancelled
Wood v. Riverside Gen. Hospital (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1113
Patient complaint letters to hospital did not comply with requirement of Government Tort Claims Act to present claim for damages before filing action
Haycock v. Hughes Aircraft Co. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1473
Wrongful termination: Presumption of at-will employment under Labor Code section 2922
Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. Cohen & Riordan (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 200
Partnership dispute arising from breakup of law firm; breaches of fiduciary duties owed by former law partners
Looney v. Superior Court (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 521
Threshold proof of “malice, oppression or fraud” must be viewed through “clear and convincing” standard
DeVilar v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit District (Sept. 20, 1993, B067510)
Duty of bus company to passenger to warn of and prevent unprovoked and unforseen assault by another passenger
Veatch v. Kubota Tractor Corp. (Feb. 3, 1993, A051524)
Personal injury action; instructional error and comparative fault issues
Waggoner v. Snow, Becker, Kroll, Klaris & Kraus, P.C. (9th Cir. 1993) 991 F.2d 1501
Attorneys’ duty to corporate officer who relied on corporations’ attorneys’ faulty legal advice
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.