Cases
GMSR has an enviable record of success on appeal. For your convenience, the firm has provided a simple search tool for guests and clients to search that record.
Wesson v. Bloom (1995, B063555)
Medical malpractice – instructional error and evidentiary issues
Lawley v. Ecology Auto Wreckers (1995, B065177)
Adequacy of superior court’s specification of reasons for granting new trial
McClure v. Nissan Motor Corp. (1995, A061475)
Negligence – allocation of responsibility and instructional errors
Mungo v. City National Bank (1995, B084558)
Impact of entry of judgment on trial court’s power to reconsider summary judgment; lender liability
Consolidated International Automotive, Inc. v. Kuang Shiung Chen (Freedman R.P.I.) (9th Cir. 1994) 51 F.3d 279 [nonpub. opn.]
$85,000 sanctions for alleged inadequate pre-filing investigation of merits
Wells Fargo Bank v. Bank of America (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 424
Enforceability of price-indexing clause in 95-year old lease based on novation of lease
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp. (1994) 9 Cal.4th 362
Legal error does not compel reversal of arbitration award (consultation)
Lewis v. Superior Court (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1850
Proper bases for lis pendens; elements of fraudulent conveyance claim; negligence of title insurer
Amylou R. v. County of Riverside (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 1205
Statutory immunity of law enforcement officer for emotional distress claims arising from interrogation conducted in criminal investigation
Main Line Pictures, Inc. v. Basinger (Sept. 22, 1994, B077509) 1994 WL 814244 [nonpublished opinion]
Judgment reversed because prejudicially ambiguous jury instruction
© 2024 Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
All rights reserved. Disclaimer - Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Los Angeles
6420 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90048
p: (310) 859 7811 | f: (310) 276 5261
San Francisco
50 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
p: (415) 315 1774
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.