GMSR: Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP

Briefs

5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90036
+1 310 859 7811
Home About Us Attorneys Library Practice News Contact Us Site Map
Briefs: Writ Petitions/Opposition

Jasmine Networks, Inc v. Superior Court (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 980

12/29/2009
Authored by Robin Meadow Marc J. Poster Alana H. Rotter
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
California Court of Appeal

The trial court dismissed a trade secrets misappropriation suit on the eve of trial, concluding that the plaintiff lost standing to pursue its claims when it sold what was left of the trade secrets to a third party but expressly retained its interest in the litigation. GMSR petitioned for a writ of mandate on behalf of the plaintiff. The petition argued that neither the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act nor any other authority requires a plaintiff to maintain ownership of its misappropriated trade secrets in order to recover for damages already incurred. The Court of Appeal agreed in a published opinion, holding that there is no “current ownership” requirement and ordering the trial court to reinstate the plaintiff’s suit.

PDF Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court Reply to Real Parties' Returns to Petition for Writ of Mandate   (95 KB PDF)


[ Briefs ]