California Supreme Court Watch

Mar 21, 2017
#17-87 Elliott Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court, S239804. (C078122; 6 Cal.App.5th 333; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201400164692CUCDGDS.)

#17-87 Elliott Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court, S239804. (C078122; 6 Cal.App.5th 333; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201400164692CUCDGDS.) Review ordered on the court’s own motion after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of peremptory mandate. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in

Mar 07, 2017
#17-83 Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc., S239686. (B264944; 6 Cal.App.5th 822; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC559720

#17-83 Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc., S239686. (B264944; 6 Cal.App.5th 822; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC559720.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed an order granting a special motion to strike in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision

Feb 21, 2017
#17-52 Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC, S238941. (B267010; 5 Cal.App.5th 154; Los Angeles County Superior Court; TC026406.)

#17-52 Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC, S238941. (B267010; 5 Cal.App.5th 154; Los Angeles County Superior Court; TC026406.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the dismissal of a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the aggrieved employee in a lawsuit based

Feb 01, 2017
#17-44 Briggs v. Brown, S238309

#17-44 Briggs v. Brown, S238309. Original proceeding. The court ordered respondents Jerry Brown, Governor of the State of California, Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California, and the Judicial Council of California to show cause why the relief sought by petitioners should not be granted. This

Jan 25, 2017
#17-35 United Auburn Indian Community of Auburn Rancheria v. Brown, S238544. (C075126; 4 Cal.App.5th 36; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201380001412CUWMGDS.)

#17-35 United Auburn Indian Community of Auburn Rancheria v. Brown, S238544. (C075126; 4 Cal.App.5th 36; Sacramento County Superior Court; 34201380001412CUWMGDS.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. This case presents the following issue:

Jan 11, 2017
#17-01 Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San Diego, S238563. (D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.)

#17-01 Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San Diego, S238563. (D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for administrative mandate. This case presents the

Dec 21, 2016
#16-445 T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of San Francisco, S238001. (A144252; 3 Cal.App.5th 334, mod. 3 Cal.App.5th 999c; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC11510703.)

#16-445 T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of San Francisco, S238001. (A144252; 3 Cal.App.5th 334, mod. 3 Cal.App.5th 999c; San Francisco County Superior Court; CGC11510703.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. This case presents the

Nov 30, 2016
#16-422 LTL Commercial, LLC v. Hammer IRP TLT Associates, LLC, S237689. (B262176, B263715; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC500790.)

#16-422 LTL Commercial, LLC v. Hammer IRP TLT Associates, LLC, S237689. (B262176, B263715; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC500790.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Mountain

Nov 22, 2016
#16-410 Marin Assn. of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S237460. (A139610; 2 Cal.App.5th 674; Main County Superior Court; CIV1300318.)

#16-410 Marin Assn. of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees’ Retirement Assn., S237460. (A139610; 2 Cal.App.5th 674; Main County Superior Court; CIV1300318.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. The court ordered briefing

Nov 22, 2016
#16-406 Borisoff v. Pullman Group, S237730. (B259675; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC454901.)

#16-406 Borisoff v. Pullman Group, S237730. (B259675; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC454901.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. The court ordered briefing deferred pending decision in Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v.

Who We Serve

PUBLIC ENTITIES

Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.

Read More
INSURERS

Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.

Read More
CORPORATE COUNSEL

GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.

Read More
TRIAL COUNSEL

The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.

Read More
INDIVIDUALS

GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.

Read More