- Client Services
- Appellate Insights
#17-52 Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC, S238941. (B267010; 5 Cal.App.5th 154; Los Angeles County Superior Court; TC026406.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the dismissal of a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Does the aggrieved employee in a lawsuit based
Appellate justices are generalists. Last week on a single Court of Appeal calendar, I listened to arguments that debated whether the justices should: Require a retroactive increase in child support; Reverse a personal injury judgment for re-trial, due to the improper discharge of a juror;
Most California litigators know Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 gives each side one opportunity at the outset of a case to have the case reassigned to a different judge. But fewer know that section 170.6 also permits a peremptory challenge after some appellate reversals
Hone your prose and keep it short As you approach appellate court Prune the verbiage, Pitch your story! Yacking earns you zero glory Hook ’em soon with why you win Own the high road, limit spin Lead with strength and deal with snags Inspire
Stipulations and other agreements can be an efficient and even helpful way to move a case along in the trial court. But be wary of being too agreeable: Under the invited error doctrine, a party that stipulates to a piece of evidence coming in or
It’s time again for that high-stakes question: is this appealable? As longtime readers know, failure to timely notice an appeal means permanent and usually irreparable loss of the appeal right. So twice a year, I run through some examples to illustrate the many ways this
Every appellate brief urges the court to rule in the briefing party’s favor. But far fewer briefs say exactly how the court should do so, and why. That lack of specificity is a mistake. A party’s job on appeal is to make it as easy
Very few deadlines in civil practice are “jurisdictional,” i.e. if you miss it, the right is irretrievably lost. Many California lawyers know that the deadline to notice an appeal is one of them. It comes 60 days after service of a notice of entry of
In the California state courts, every order granting or denying an anti-SLAPP motion is immediately appealable. But anti-SLAPP appealability is more of a minefield in the Ninth Circuit. There, an anti-SLAPP ruling is appealable only if it satisfies the requirements of the “collateral order doctrine”
Under current rules, the California Supreme Court’s decision to review a published appellate opinion automatically “depublishes” that opinion while review is pending — making it non-citable. This approach causes problems. It eliminates useful discussions of un-reviewed issues. And when the reviewable conflict among districts arises
Whether on appeal, assisting trial counsel, or advising government officials contemplating legislative action, GMSR provides unique insight into the complex laws that impact public entities.
Where coverage may exist, GMSR represents insureds on appeal effectively and efficiently. Where it does not, the firm protects insurers’ right to deny claims.
GMSR offers corporate clients objective assessments on appeal, based on a deep understanding of the limitations and opportunities of appellate review.
The firm’s lawyers are team players, collaborating with trial counsel at any level from legal strategy to writing or editing trial court motions and appellate briefs.
GMSR vigorously advocates the rights of individual plaintiffs and defendants, in both state and federal appellate courts.
We welcome your inquiry. However, sending us an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. For that reason, you should not send us any kind of confidential information. Until we have agreed to represent you, we cannot be obligated to keep it confidential.